Gender crossing as caesura versus gender crossing as cut

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the conditions which enable the establishing of a dialectic and unsaturated gender space – one that enables both a concrete and fantasised creative mobility between the two gender poles – versus the conditions which generate a polar, saturated, gender dichotomous stagnation and stasis. Gender dichotomy is probably the most primary dichotomy internalised in human thinking, acting as a prototype for all the later dichotomies, in a sense inaugurating dichotomous thinking in general – first in the imaginary of the parent who holds the soon-to-be-born infant in his or her mind – and afterwards in the infant's mind. The chapter also contains two short discussions of these points.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWorking Psychoanalytically with Gender Diversity and Sexualities
Subtitle of host publicationResistances to Differences
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages131-148
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781040428597
ISBN (Print)9781003531333
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 selection and editorial matter, Frances Thomson-Salo, Marco Posadas, and Silvia R. Acosta; individual chapters, the contributors.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology
  • General Social Sciences
  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender crossing as caesura versus gender crossing as cut'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this