Abstract
I argue that the study of variability rather than invariance should head the reading research agenda, and that strong claims of orthographic "optimality" are unwarranted. I also expand briefly on Frost's assertion that an efficient orthography must represent sound and meaning, by considering writing systems as dual-purpose devices that must provide decipherability for novice readers and automatizability for the expert.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 307-308 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience