Forum shopping between civil and shari’a courts: Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Forum shopping," namely "[t]he practice of choosing the most favourable jurisdiction or court in which a claim may be heard" (Garner, 2001, p. 590), is highly prevalent in situations of legal pluralism. In such situations, actors are often able to choose between several legal forums, and tend to prefer the forum that they perceive as best serving their interests. Surprisingly, this practice has received but meager attention in anthropological studies of legal pluralism.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReligion in Disputes
Subtitle of host publicationPervasiveness of Religious Normativity in Disputing Processes
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages147-164
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781137318343
ISBN (Print)9781137322043
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2013

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences
  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forum shopping between civil and shari’a courts: Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this