Forming and supporting circles of support for people with intellectual disabilities–a comparative case analysis

Tal Araten-Bergman, Christine Bigby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Building Circles of Support is an innovative strategy for developing natural support networks. This study explored some of the ambiguity in the conceptualisations, operational elements, and perceived outcomes of Circles of Support programs. Method: A comparative case study of three Australian Circles of Support programs was conducted. Data included document review and qualitative interviews with 27 key stakeholders. Qualitative analysis of the data from each program was analysed using categories of the program logic as a conceptual framework, followed by cross-case analysis to identify commonalities and differences. Results: Findings show conceptual variability between programs, which shared similar overarching intents but differed in program, strategies, target population and outcomes, which were shaped by the missions of the organisation of which they were part. Conclusion: Findings can inform the future design and evaluation of programs to support the development of informal support network for people with intellectual disabilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-189
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by Inclusion Melbourne.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Adults with intellectual disabilities
  • informal support networks
  • interventions
  • program design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forming and supporting circles of support for people with intellectual disabilities–a comparative case analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this