Formality in logic: From logical terms to semantic constraints

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In this paper I discuss a prevailing view by which logical terms determine forms of sentences and arguments and therefore the logical validity of arguments. This view is common to those who hold that there is a principled distinction between logical and nonlogical terms and those holding relativistic accounts. I adopt the Tarskian tradition by which logical validity is determined by form, but reject the centrality of logical terms. I propose an alternative framework for logic where logical terms no longer play a distinctive role. This account employs a new notion of semantic constraints. The paper includes some preliminary definitions and results in the new framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-276
Number of pages18
JournalLogique et Analyse
Issue number227
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by Peelers Publishers. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Formality in logic: From logical terms to semantic constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this