Focus article: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making

Raanan Lipshitz, Gary Klein, Judith Orasanu, Eduardo Salas

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review


We review the progress of naturalistic decision making (NDM) in the decade since the first conference on the subject in 1989. After setting out a brief history of NDM we identify its essential characteristics and consider five of its main contributions: recognition-primed decisions, coping with uncertainty, team decision making, decision errors, and methodology. NDM helped identify important areas of inquiry previously neglected (e.g. the use of expertise in sizing up situations and generating options), it introduced new models, conceptualizations, and methods, and recruited applied investigators into the field. Above all, NDM contributed a new perspective on how decisions (broadly defined as committing oneself to a certain course of action) are made. NDM still faccs significant challenges, including improvement of the quantity and rigor of its empirical research, and confirming the validity of its prescriptive models.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDecision Making in Aviation
PublisherCRC Press
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781351570046
ISBN (Print)9780754628675
StatePublished - 5 Jul 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Don Harris and Wen-Chin Li 2015. All rights reserved.


  • Coping with uncertainty
  • Decision errors
  • Decision training
  • Naturalistic decision making
  • Recognition-primed decisions
  • Research methodology
  • Team decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering


Dive into the research topics of 'Focus article: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this