Abstract
We investigate the relation between δ and ϵ required for obtaining a (1+δ)-approximation in time N2−ϵ for closest pair problems under various distance metrics, and for other related problems in fine-grained complexity. Specifically, our main result shows that if it is impossible to (exactly) solve the (bichromatic) inner product (IP) problem for vectors of dimension clogN in time N2−ϵ, then there is no (1+δ)-approximation algorithm for (bichromatic) Euclidean Closest Pair running in time N2−2ϵ, where δ≈(ϵ/c)2 (where ≈ hides polylog factors). This improves on the prior result due to Chen and Williams (SODA 2019) which gave a smaller polynomial dependence of δ on ϵ, on the order of δ≈(ϵ/c)6. Our result implies in turn that no (1+δ)-approximation algorithm exists for Euclidean closest pair for δ≈ϵ4, unless an algorithmic improvement for IP is obtained. This in turn is very close to the approximation guarantee of δ≈ϵ3 for Euclidean closest pair, given by the best known algorithm of Almam, Chan, and Williams (FOCS 2016). By known reductions, a similar result follows for a host of other related problems in fine-grained hardness of approximation. Our reduction combines the hardness of approximation framework of Chen and Williams, together with an MA communication protocol for IP over a small alphabet, that is inspired by the MA protocol of Chen (Theory of Computing, 2020).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 114976 |
Journal | Theoretical Computer Science |
Volume | 1026 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 12 Feb 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Theoretical Computer Science
- General Computer Science