Financial education and savings outcomes for low-income IDA participants: Does age make a difference?

Michal Grinstein-Weiss, Shenyang Guo, Vanessa Reinertson, Blair Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study considers the impact of financial education dosage on savings outcomes of participants in Individual Development Account (IDA) programs. It analyzes data from a sample of approximately 2,000 participants in the American Dream Policy Demonstration, disaggregates outcomes by age, and uses propensity score modeling to control for endogeneity and selection bias. We find that, relative to counterparts who did not complete educational requirements, IDA participants who completed program requirements for financial education had higher average monthly savings, saved a higher portion of their income, and deposited savings more frequently. Notably, we find that participants aged 36 or older experienced increasing returns on investment in financial education, and the best outcomes are found among those with more than 200% of the required dose of financial education. However, younger participants with more than 100% of the required dose are found to experience a diminishing return on their investment in financial education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-185
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Consumer Affairs
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by The American Council on Consumer Interests.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial education and savings outcomes for low-income IDA participants: Does age make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this