Fetal demise in the early second trimester: Sonographic findings

Zeev Blumenfeld, Nizar Khatib, Etan Z. Zimmer, Moshe Bronshtein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To report the etiology and the sonographic findings of fetal demise at 14-17 weeks' gestation. Methods: A prospective transvaginal sonographic search of fetal anomalies was performed in 61 early second-trimester cases of fetal demise. The findings were compared with the results of sonographic examinations of 22,500 viable fetuses between weeks 14 and 17. Results: Of 61 cases of early fetal demise in 60 women (1:370), more than half of the fetuses (35/61, 57%) were associated with fetal edema, ranging from nuchal edema and cystic hygroma to fetal hydrops. In 9/61 (14.7%) fetuses, major anatomic anomalies were detected. There was no significant difference between the study group (nonviable fetuses) and the control group (viable fetuses) regarding maternal age and the prevalence of maternal fever, maternal thrombophilic mutations, vaginal bleeding, fertility treatments, maternal diseases, or use of medications. Conclusions: The incidence of early midtrimester fetal demise is 1:370 pregnancies. The sonographic findings in fetal demise in the early second trimester suggest that 57% of them are associated with fetal edema and 14.7% are associated with major fetal malformations. We did not identify any significant maternal risk factor for fetal demise in the study group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-112
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Ultrasound
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • Early pregnancy
  • Fetal demise
  • Fetal malformations
  • Miscarriage
  • Obstetrics
  • Prenatal diagnosis
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fetal demise in the early second trimester: Sonographic findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this