TY - JOUR
T1 - Facial atopic dermatitis may be exacerbated by masks
T2 - insights from a multicenter, teledermatology, prospective study during COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Damiani, Giovanni
AU - Finelli, Renata
AU - Kridin, Khalaf
AU - Pacifico, Alessia
AU - Bragazzi, Nicola L.
AU - Malagoli, Piergiorgio
AU - Fabbrocini, Gabriella
AU - Marasca, Claudio
AU - Annunziata, Marica
AU - Grada, Ayman
AU - Santus, Pierachille
AU - Savoia, Paola
AU - Gironi, Laura C.
AU - Buja, Alessandra
AU - Linder, Dennis
AU - Pigatto, Paolo D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 edizioni minerva medica.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) display a defective skin barrier, consequently they may experience inflammatory flares with different exposures, including masks. Actually, beside scattering case reports, no study focused on the possible AD flaring due to masks. metHoDS: In this multicenter prospective study aD patients with facial manifestation were followed with teledermatology and evaluated by two board-certified dermatologists at the baseline (T0) and after 1 month (T1) in which patients started to wear masks >6 hours per day. Demographics and clinical parameters, included and not limited to eczema area and Severity Index (eaSI) and Dermatology life Quality Index (DlQI), were carefully collected and analyzed. reSultS: We enrolled 57 aD patients (m/f 28/29, 33.91±12.26 years old) that wore surgical masks (38 [66.7%]), community masks (11 [19.3%] and N95 (8 [14.0%]). Both DLQI and EASI increase during the time period (P<0.0001). DLQI variation was not influenced by age, BMI, and gender, mask type used and AD therapy (P=0.99), whilst EASI variation was significantly influenced by BMI, gender, and therapy (P=0.004). CoNCluSIoNS: mask wearing may prove detrimental to patients with atopic eczema and the same may not necessarily be the case for asthma patients.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) display a defective skin barrier, consequently they may experience inflammatory flares with different exposures, including masks. Actually, beside scattering case reports, no study focused on the possible AD flaring due to masks. metHoDS: In this multicenter prospective study aD patients with facial manifestation were followed with teledermatology and evaluated by two board-certified dermatologists at the baseline (T0) and after 1 month (T1) in which patients started to wear masks >6 hours per day. Demographics and clinical parameters, included and not limited to eczema area and Severity Index (eaSI) and Dermatology life Quality Index (DlQI), were carefully collected and analyzed. reSultS: We enrolled 57 aD patients (m/f 28/29, 33.91±12.26 years old) that wore surgical masks (38 [66.7%]), community masks (11 [19.3%] and N95 (8 [14.0%]). Both DLQI and EASI increase during the time period (P<0.0001). DLQI variation was not influenced by age, BMI, and gender, mask type used and AD therapy (P=0.99), whilst EASI variation was significantly influenced by BMI, gender, and therapy (P=0.004). CoNCluSIoNS: mask wearing may prove detrimental to patients with atopic eczema and the same may not necessarily be the case for asthma patients.
KW - CoVID-19
KW - Dermatitis, atopic
KW - Masks
KW - N95 respirators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146484546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 36177781
AN - SCOPUS:85146484546
SN - 2784-8671
VL - 157
SP - 505
EP - 509
JO - Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology
JF - Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology
IS - 6
ER -