Abstract
Crafting and maintaining peace agreements is one of the most critical challenges in international relations and conflict resolution. Despite their initial promise, many such deals have failed, sparking renewed conflict and instability. This article argues that two primary factors influence the durability of these agreements: elite positions and interests reinforced by strong domestic institutions, and mediator involvement and guarantees. Through theoretical analysis and empirical evidence, the study demonstrates how these interconnected factors shape the likelihood of sustained peace and provides insights for improving future processes. Central to the analysis are case studies of two accords Israel forged with its neighbors—Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994. While the details of how the deals were created are important, more crucial is the examination of threats to their implementation and reasons for their durability, especially since the October 7 attacks. The article therefore improves on contemporary studies that focus on strategies to achieve peace agreements but underplay the importance of the factors that determine endurance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 67-86 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Middle East Policy |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Middle East Policy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Middle East Policy Council.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining the Post-October 7 Durability of Israel's Peace Deals with Egypt and Jordan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver