Abstract
In this response to the target article by Law, Power, and Quinto-Pozos, which correctly points out that phonological change is a characteristic of both spoken and signed language, I note that we have more to learn from sign languages. Since sign languages are all very young in comparison to oral languages, linguists have an opportunity to observe phonological change as it occurs. Law et al. do not take into account the winding path of phonological change and the social and structural factors that influence this path. Conditions for such changes can be determined in part by the modality (oral or signed) in each type of language, as I discuss here.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e289-e294 |
| Journal | Language |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025, Linguistic Society of America. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- iconicity
- linearity
- modality
- phonological change
- sign language
- spoken language
- variation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exigencies of emerging phonological processes in sign languages: Response to Law, Power, and Quinto-Pozos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver