Evaluating users' perceptions about a system's privacy: Differentiating social and institutional aspects

Oshrat Ayalon, Eran Toch

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

System design has a crucial effect on users' privacy, but privacy-by-design processes in organizations rarely involve end-users. To bridge this gap, we investigate how User-Centered Design (UCD) concepts can be used to test how users perceive their privacy in system designs. We describe a series of three online experiments, with 1,313 participants overall, in which we attempt to develop and validate the reliability of a scale for Users' Perceived Systems' Privacy (UPSP). We found that users' privacy perceptions of information systems consist of three distinctive aspects: institutional, social and risk. We combined our scale with A/B testing methodology to compare different privacy design variants for given background scenarios. Our results show that the methodology and the scale are mostly applicable for evaluating the social aspects of privacy designs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 15th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2019
PublisherUSENIX Association
Pages41-59
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781939133052
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes
Event15th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2019 - Santa Clara, United States
Duration: 12 Aug 201913 Aug 2019

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 15th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2019

Conference

Conference15th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2019
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySanta Clara
Period12/08/1913/08/19

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© is held by the author/owner.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating users' perceptions about a system's privacy: Differentiating social and institutional aspects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this