ESM-Q: A consensus-based quality assessment tool for experience sampling method items

Gudrun Eisele, Anu Hiekkaranta, Yoram K. Kunkels, Marije aan het Rot, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Sara Laureen Bartels, Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen, Patrick N. Beymer, Lauren M. Bylsma, Ryan W. Carpenter, William D. Ellison, Aaron J. Fisher, Thomas Forkmann, Madelyn R. Frumkin, Daniel Fulford, Kristin Naragon-Gainey, Talya Greene, Vera E. Heininga, Andrew Jones, Elise K. KalokerinosPeter Kuppens, Kathryn L. Modecki, Fabiola Müller, Andreas B. Neubauer, Vanessa Panaite, Maude Schneider, Jessie Sun, Stephen J. Wilson, Caroline Zygar-Hoffmann, Inez Myin-Germeys, Olivia J. Kirtley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The experience sampling method (ESM) is increasingly used by researchers from various disciplines to answer novel questions about individuals’ daily lives. Measurement best practices have long been overlooked in ESM research, and recent reviews show that item quality is often not reported in ESM studies. The absence of information about item quality may be partly explained by the lack of consensus on how ESM item quality should be evaluated. As part of the ESM Item Repository project (esmitemrepository.com)—an international open science initiative that collects ESM items in an open item bank and evaluates their quality—we brought together 42 international ESM experts to develop an ESM item quality assessment tool. In four Delphi phases, experts suggested 57 item quality criteria, rated the criteria, provided arguments for and against the criteria, and rated the criteria again, considering reflections from other experts. The result of the Delphi process is ESM-Q: a quality assessment tool consisting of 10 core criteria, as well as an additional 15 supplementary criteria, to be used depending on the type of items being rated and the availability of supplementary information. The criteria cover topics ranging from construct validity to the optimal wording of items. ESM-Q can aid ESM researchers in selecting existing ESM items, developing new high-quality ESM items, and evaluating the quality of ESM items in systematic reviews. Expert reflections also highlight open research questions surrounding ESM item design that form a research agenda for ESM measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number124
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Mar 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2025.

Keywords

  • Ambulatory assessment
  • Delphi study
  • Ecological momentary assessment
  • Item quality criteria
  • Questionnaire development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ESM-Q: A consensus-based quality assessment tool for experience sampling method items'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this