TY - JOUR
T1 - ESM-Q
T2 - A consensus-based quality assessment tool for experience sampling method items
AU - Eisele, Gudrun
AU - Hiekkaranta, Anu
AU - Kunkels, Yoram K.
AU - Rot, Marije aan het
AU - van Ballegooijen, Wouter
AU - Bartels, Sara Laureen
AU - Bastiaansen, Jojanneke A.
AU - Beymer, Patrick N.
AU - Bylsma, Lauren M.
AU - Carpenter, Ryan W.
AU - Ellison, William D.
AU - Fisher, Aaron J.
AU - Forkmann, Thomas
AU - Frumkin, Madelyn R.
AU - Fulford, Daniel
AU - Naragon-Gainey, Kristin
AU - Greene, Talya
AU - Heininga, Vera E.
AU - Jones, Andrew
AU - Kalokerinos, Elise K.
AU - Kuppens, Peter
AU - Modecki, Kathryn L.
AU - Müller, Fabiola
AU - Neubauer, Andreas B.
AU - Panaite, Vanessa
AU - Schneider, Maude
AU - Sun, Jessie
AU - Wilson, Stephen J.
AU - Zygar-Hoffmann, Caroline
AU - Myin-Germeys, Inez
AU - Kirtley, Olivia J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2025.
PY - 2025/3/21
Y1 - 2025/3/21
N2 - The experience sampling method (ESM) is increasingly used by researchers from various disciplines to answer novel questions about individuals’ daily lives. Measurement best practices have long been overlooked in ESM research, and recent reviews show that item quality is often not reported in ESM studies. The absence of information about item quality may be partly explained by the lack of consensus on how ESM item quality should be evaluated. As part of the ESM Item Repository project (esmitemrepository.com)—an international open science initiative that collects ESM items in an open item bank and evaluates their quality—we brought together 42 international ESM experts to develop an ESM item quality assessment tool. In four Delphi phases, experts suggested 57 item quality criteria, rated the criteria, provided arguments for and against the criteria, and rated the criteria again, considering reflections from other experts. The result of the Delphi process is ESM-Q: a quality assessment tool consisting of 10 core criteria, as well as an additional 15 supplementary criteria, to be used depending on the type of items being rated and the availability of supplementary information. The criteria cover topics ranging from construct validity to the optimal wording of items. ESM-Q can aid ESM researchers in selecting existing ESM items, developing new high-quality ESM items, and evaluating the quality of ESM items in systematic reviews. Expert reflections also highlight open research questions surrounding ESM item design that form a research agenda for ESM measurement.
AB - The experience sampling method (ESM) is increasingly used by researchers from various disciplines to answer novel questions about individuals’ daily lives. Measurement best practices have long been overlooked in ESM research, and recent reviews show that item quality is often not reported in ESM studies. The absence of information about item quality may be partly explained by the lack of consensus on how ESM item quality should be evaluated. As part of the ESM Item Repository project (esmitemrepository.com)—an international open science initiative that collects ESM items in an open item bank and evaluates their quality—we brought together 42 international ESM experts to develop an ESM item quality assessment tool. In four Delphi phases, experts suggested 57 item quality criteria, rated the criteria, provided arguments for and against the criteria, and rated the criteria again, considering reflections from other experts. The result of the Delphi process is ESM-Q: a quality assessment tool consisting of 10 core criteria, as well as an additional 15 supplementary criteria, to be used depending on the type of items being rated and the availability of supplementary information. The criteria cover topics ranging from construct validity to the optimal wording of items. ESM-Q can aid ESM researchers in selecting existing ESM items, developing new high-quality ESM items, and evaluating the quality of ESM items in systematic reviews. Expert reflections also highlight open research questions surrounding ESM item design that form a research agenda for ESM measurement.
KW - Ambulatory assessment
KW - Delphi study
KW - Ecological momentary assessment
KW - Item quality criteria
KW - Questionnaire development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000545757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13428-025-02626-1
DO - 10.3758/s13428-025-02626-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 40119188
AN - SCOPUS:105000545757
SN - 1554-351X
VL - 57
JO - Behavior Research Methods
JF - Behavior Research Methods
IS - 4
M1 - 124
ER -