Abstract
We compare the electrostatic behavior of a single polar molecule adsorbed on a solid substrate with that of an adsorbed polar monolayer. This is accomplished by comparing first principles calculations obtained within a cluster model and a periodic slab model, using benzene derivatives on the Si(111) surface as a representative test case. We find that the two models offer diametrically opposite descriptions of the surface electrostatic phenomena. Slab electrostatics is dominated by dipole reduction due to intermolecular dipole-dipole interactions that partially depolarize the molecules, with charge migration to the substrate playing a negligible role due to electric field suppression outside the monolayer. Conversely, cluster electrostatics is dominated by dipole enhancement due to charge migration to/from the substrate, with only a small polarization of the molecule. This establishes the important role played by long-range interactions, in addition to local chemical properties, in tailoring surface chemistry via polar molecule adsorption.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2989-2997 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Chemical Society |
| Volume | 129 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 14 Mar 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Catalysis
- General Chemistry
- Biochemistry
- Colloid and Surface Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Electrostatic properties of adsorbed polar molecules: Opposite behavior of a single molecule and a molecular monolayer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver