Elections, Party Rhetoric, and Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe

Elizabeth Dekeyser, Michael Freedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Recent elections have highlighted how electoral cycles are often accompanied by increases in negative rhetoric surrounding immigration. Exploiting as-if random assignment in individual interview dates for the European Social Survey, this paper examines how proximity to elections affects individual preferences on immigration. We find that closer to elections, attitudes toward immigration become more negative. This effect is primarily driven by country-elections where party platforms are more likely to include anti-immigrant rhetoric. When elections are more distant, these effects largely disappear, highlighting the possibility that anti-immigration electoral mandates are based on artificially inflated concerns of the electorate about immigration. Overall, these results provide important insights into how elections influence issue stances and social cohesion in Europe.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Behavior
Early online date21 Jun 2021
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.


  • Elections
  • Europe
  • Far right parties
  • Immigration
  • Party rhetoric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Elections, Party Rhetoric, and Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this