Abstract
A bargaining solution satisfies egalitarian–utilitarian monotonicity (EUM) if the following holds under feasible-set-expansion: a decrease in the value of the Rawlsian (resp. utilitarian) objective is accompanied by an increase in the value of the utilitarian (resp. Rawlsian) objective. A bargaining solution is welfarist if it maximizes a symmetric and strictly concave social welfare function. Every 2-person welfarist solution satisfies EUM, but for n≥ 3 every n-person welfarist solution violates it. In the presence of other standard axioms, EUM characterizes the Nash solution in the 2-person case, but leads to impossibility in the n-person case.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 741-751 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Social Choice and Welfare |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics