Effectiveness of welfare organizations: The contribution of leadership styles, staff cohesion, and worker empowerment

Amnon Boehm, Nir Yoels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Numerous recent studies reveal the contribution of leadership and leadership style, in particular, to effectiveness in different organizations (Sosik et al., 1998; Ogbnna and Harris, 2000; Hoyt and Blascovich, 2003; Hullinger, 2003; Berson and Avolio, 2004), including the field of welfare organizations (Gummer, 1995; Arches, 1997; Fisher, 2005; Mary, 2005). These publications suggest a preference for the transformational, compared with the transactional, leadership style. However, the studies reviewed do not examine the contribution of organizational leadership compared with other aspects of organizational life. Using the previous studies as its point of departure, the present research examines the contribution of the leadership styles of the directors in welfare departments to the effectiveness of the social workers in these organizations. However, it also undertakes another task, by comparing the contribution of leadership style to effectiveness with that of staff cohesion and social worker empowerment. Thus, the findings and discussion presented in this paper compare the respective contributions of three central levels of the organization to effectiveness - the administrative level (director's leadership styles), the staff level (staff cohesion), and the individual level of the social worker (worker empowerment). The research examines this issue in a public welfare department in Israel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1360-1380
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Issue number7
StatePublished - Oct 2009


  • Cohesiveness
  • Effectiveness
  • Empowerment
  • Leadership styles
  • Welfare organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of welfare organizations: The contribution of leadership styles, staff cohesion, and worker empowerment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this