Effectiveness of “the IUCN red list of threatened species” application on a regional scale: Current state of the “red data books” of Russia

Igor Popov, Anastasia Fadeeva, Elena Palenova, George Shamilishvily, Kirill Gorin, Andrey Burdo, Evgenia Melchakova, Yulia Trofimova, Viktor Sukristik, Nadezhda Morova, Ksenia Kroo, Yulia Kirillova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Nowadays at least 140 Red Data books or lists are used in Russia. They reflect threatened species of various subdivisions of Russia in addition to all-Russian Red Data book. None of them uses criteria for the species assessment of the modern version of the IUCN list. Non-threatened species had not been included in the Russian red books. Most of species listed in the all-Russian Red Data book (77 %) has not yet been assessed for the IUCN red list. These particularities indicate on the necessity of gap-analysis in the planning of the following work on the IUCN red list keeping. It should focus first of all on revealing of the most urgent objectives, but not on the simple increase of species assessments. Now more than a half of species of “Тhe IUCN red list of threatened species” are not threatened ones, that is why its title does not reflect its contents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-60
Number of pages4
JournalBiological Communications
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Popov et al.

Keywords

  • Methodology
  • Red Data book
  • Red list

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of “the IUCN red list of threatened species” application on a regional scale: Current state of the “red data books” of Russia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this