Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income countries: multicentre randomised controlled trial

  • Bernd Puschner
  • , Juliet Nakku
  • , Ramona Hiltensperger
  • , Philip Wolf
  • , Inbar Adler Ben-Dor
  • , Faith Bugeiga
  • , Ashleigh Charles
  • , Lion Gai Meir
  • , Paula Garber-Epstein
  • , Yael Goldfarb
  • , Alina Grayzman
  • , Shimri Hadas-Grundman
  • , Maria Haun
  • , Imke Heuer
  • , Bahati Iboma
  • , Jasmine Kalha
  • , Lydia Kamwaga
  • , Palak Korde
  • , Yasuhiro Kotera
  • , Silvia Krumm
  • Arti Kulkarni, Eric Kwebiiha, Jennifer Kyara, Max Lachman, Candelaria Mahlke, Benjamin Mayer, Galia Moran, Richard Mpango, Rachel Mtei, Annabel Müller-Stierlin, Roseline Nanyonga, Fileuka Ngakongwa, Jackline Niwemuhwezi, Rebecca Nixdorf, Lena Nugent, Soumitra Pathare, Mary Ramesh, Grace Ryan, Gwen Schulz, Maria Wagner, Tamara Waldmann, Lisa Wenzel, Donat Shamba, Mike Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Some trials have evaluated peer support for people with mental ill health in high-income, mainly English-speaking countries, but the quality of the evidence is weak. Aims To investigate the effectiveness of UPSIDES peer support in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Method This pragmatic multicentre parallel-group wait-list randomised controlled trial (registration: ISRCTN26008944) with three measurement points (baseline and 4 and 8 months) took place at six study sites: two in Germany, and one each in Uganda, Tanzania, Israel and India. Participants were adults with longstanding severe mental health conditions. Outcomes were improvements in social inclusion (primary) and empowerment, hope, recovery, health and social functioning (secondary). Participants allocated to the intervention group were offered UPSIDES peer support. Results Of the 615 participants (305 intervention group), 337 (54.8%) identified as women. The average age was 38.3 (s.d. = 11.2) years, and the mean illness duration was 14.9 (s.d. = 38.4) years. Those allocated to the intervention group received 6.9 (s.d. = 4.2) peer support sessions on average. Intention-to-treat analysis showed effects on two of the three subscales of the Social Inclusion Scale, Empowerment Scale and HOPE Scale. Per-protocol analysis with participants who had received three or more intervention sessions also showed an effect on the Social Inclusion Scale total score (β = 0.18, P = 0.031, 95% CI: 0.02–0.34). Conclusions Peer support has beneficial impacts on social inclusion, empowerment and hope among people with severe mental health conditions across diverse settings. As social isolation is a key driver of mental ill health, and empowerment and hope are both crucial for recovery, peer support can be recommended as an effective component of mental healthcare. Peer support has the potential to move global mental health closer towards a recovery- and rights-based orientation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-68
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume229
Issue number1
Early online date27 Jun 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Peer support
  • global mental health
  • randomised controlled trial
  • recovery-oriented care
  • social inclusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income countries: multicentre randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this