Early Mousterian Levallois Technology in Unit IX of Tabun Cave

Ron Shimelmitz, Steven L. Kuhn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Following the stratigraphic sequence described by D. Garrod in her pioneering excavations at Tabun Cave, the Levantine Mousterian is traditionally divided into three sub-stages (B, C, D) according to changes in modal forms of Levallois production. Despite the ubiquity of this terminology, none of these three stages from Tabun has been described in detail. Furthermore, our knowledge of variability in technology and chronology within the Levantine Middle Paleolithic has increased markedly in the last three decades. This variation is especially apparent in the Early Middle Paleolithic, when both Levallois and non-Levallois laminar methods appear in most sites but with different frequencies. In this paper we provide a reconstruction of the Levallois technology in the early Middle
Paleolithic of Tabun Cave using assemblages from Jelinek’s excavations in Unit IX (Garrod’s layer D). In contrast to many other contemporary sites, where non-Levallois laminar production is strongly represented, the assemblage
of Unit IX is dominated by a recurrent, unipolar Levallois technology. Understanding the specific character of the “prototype” of Tabun D is an important step towards assessing inter- and intra-assemblage variability within the Levantine Early Middle Paleolithic. Appreciating this variation is in turn essential for explaining the apparently sudden appearance of these early Mousterian assemblages between 200 and 250 kya. The method used at Tabun
Unit IX is both flexible and efficient, yielding both large numbers of blanks and a range of products while reducing the waste of material involved in shaping and maintaining of the core. In these assemblages, blades, flakes and
Levallois points, and a variety of other products, were produced through systematic exploitation of different parts of the core’s surface. In this respect the technology of Tabun Unit IX differs from the ‘laminar method’ known from
other early Levantine assemblages in the organization of production and in its economic features and the range of products.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalPaleoAnthropology
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early Mousterian Levallois Technology in Unit IX of Tabun Cave'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this