Dynamic establishment and maintenance of the human intestinal B cell population and repertoire following transplantation in a pediatric-dominated cohort

Jianing Fu, Thomas Hsiao, Elizabeth Waffarn, Wenzhao Meng, Katherine D. Long, Kristjana Frangaj, Rebecca Jones, Alaka Gorur, Areen Shtewe, Muyang Li, Constanza Bay Muntnich, Kortney Rogers, Wenyu Jiao, Monica Velasco, Rei Matsumoto, Masaru Kubota, Steven Wells, Nichole Danzl, Shilpa Ravella, Alina IugaElena Rodica Vasilescu, Adam Griesemer, Joshua Weiner, Donna L. Farber, Eline T. Luning Prak, Mercedes Martinez, Tomoaki Kato, Uri Hershberg, Megan Sykes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: It is unknown how intestinal B cell populations and B cell receptor (BCR) repertoires are established and maintained over time in humans. Following intestinal transplantation (ITx), surveillance ileal mucosal biopsies provide a unique opportunity to map the dynamic establishment of recipient gut lymphocyte populations in immunosuppressed conditions. Methods: Using polychromatic flow cytometry that includes HLA allele group-specific antibodies distinguishing donor from recipient cells along with high throughput BCR sequencing, we tracked the establishment of recipient B cell populations and BCR repertoire in the allograft mucosa of ITx recipients. Results: We confirm the early presence of naïve donor B cells in the circulation (donor age range: 1-14 years, median: 3 years) and, for the first time, document the establishment of recipient B cell populations, including B resident memory cells, in the intestinal allograft mucosa (recipient age range at the time of transplant: 1-44 years, median: 3 years). Recipient B cell repopulation of the allograft was most rapid in infant (<1 year old)-derived allografts and, unlike T cell repopulation, did not correlate with rejection rates. While recipient memory B cell populations were increased in graft mucosa compared to circulation, naïve recipient B cells remained detectable in the graft mucosa for years. Comparisons of peripheral and intra-mucosal B cell repertoires in the absence of rejection (recipient age range at the time of transplant: 1-9 years, median: 2 years) revealed increased BCR mutation rates and clonal expansion in graft mucosa compared to circulating B cells, but these parameters did not increase markedly after the first year post-transplant. Furthermore, clonal mixing between the allograft mucosa and the circulation was significantly greater in ITx recipients, even years after transplantation, than in deceased adult donors. In available pan-scope biopsies from pediatric recipients, we observed higher percentages of naïve recipient B cells in colon allograft compared to small bowel allograft and increased BCR overlap between native colon vs colon allograft compared to that between native colon vs ileum allograft in most cases, suggesting differential clonal distribution in large intestine vs small intestine. Discussion: Collectively, our data demonstrate intestinal mucosal B cell repertoire establishment from a circulating pool, a process that continues for years without evidence of stabilization of the mucosal B cell repertoire in pediatric ITx patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1375486
JournalFrontiers in Immunology
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Fu, Hsiao, Waffarn, Meng, Long, Frangaj, Jones, Gorur, Shtewe, Li, Muntnich, Rogers, Jiao, Velasco, Matsumoto, Kubota, Wells, Danzl, Ravella, Iuga, Vasilescu, Griesemer, Weiner, Farber, Luning Prak, Martinez, Kato, Hershberg and Sykes.

Keywords

  • B cell repertoire sequencing
  • B cell subpopulations
  • human longitudinal studies
  • intestinal transplantation
  • resident memory B cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic establishment and maintenance of the human intestinal B cell population and repertoire following transplantation in a pediatric-dominated cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this