TY - JOUR
T1 - Does experimental pain affect auditory processing of speech-relevant signals? a study in healthy young adults
AU - Sapir, Shimon
AU - Pud, Dorit
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Aim: To assess the effect of tonic pain stimulation on auditory processing of speech-relevant acoustic signals in healthy pain-free volunteers. Methods: Sixty university students, randomly assigned to either a thermal pain stimulation (46°C/6 min) group (PS) or no pain stimulation group (NPS), performed a rate change detection task (RCDT) involving sinusoidally frequency-modulated vowel-like signals. Task difficulty was manipulated by changing the rate of the modulated signals (henceforth rate). Perceived pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100). Results: Mean pain rating was ~33 in the PS group and ~3 in the NPS group. Pain stimulation was associated with poorer performance on the RCDT, but this trend was not statistically significant. Performance worsened with increasing rate of signal modulation in both groups (p < 0.0001), with no pain by rate interaction. Conclusions: The present findings indicate a trend whereby mild or moderate pain appears to affect auditory processing of speech-relevant acoustic signals. This trend, however, was not statistically significant. It is possible that more intense pain would yield more pronounced (deleterious) effects on auditory processing, but this needs to be verified empirically.
AB - Aim: To assess the effect of tonic pain stimulation on auditory processing of speech-relevant acoustic signals in healthy pain-free volunteers. Methods: Sixty university students, randomly assigned to either a thermal pain stimulation (46°C/6 min) group (PS) or no pain stimulation group (NPS), performed a rate change detection task (RCDT) involving sinusoidally frequency-modulated vowel-like signals. Task difficulty was manipulated by changing the rate of the modulated signals (henceforth rate). Perceived pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100). Results: Mean pain rating was ~33 in the PS group and ~3 in the NPS group. Pain stimulation was associated with poorer performance on the RCDT, but this trend was not statistically significant. Performance worsened with increasing rate of signal modulation in both groups (p < 0.0001), with no pain by rate interaction. Conclusions: The present findings indicate a trend whereby mild or moderate pain appears to affect auditory processing of speech-relevant acoustic signals. This trend, however, was not statistically significant. It is possible that more intense pain would yield more pronounced (deleterious) effects on auditory processing, but this needs to be verified empirically.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55049102037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/JBCPP.2008.19.3-4.281
DO - 10.1515/JBCPP.2008.19.3-4.281
M3 - Article
C2 - 19025037
AN - SCOPUS:55049102037
SN - 0792-6855
VL - 19
SP - 281
EP - 300
JO - Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
JF - Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
IS - 3-4
ER -