Does Emotional Intelligence Meet Traditional Standards for an Intelligence? Some New Data and Conclusions

Richard D. Roberts, Moshe Zeidner, Gerald Matthews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Performance-based measures of emotional intelligence (EI) are more likely than measures based on self-report to assess EI as a construct distinct from personality. A multivariate investigation was conducted with the performance-based, Multi-Factor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS; J.D. Mayer, D. Caruso, & P. Salovey, 1999). Participants (N = 704) also completed the Trait Self-Description Inventory (TSDI, a measure of the Big Five personality factors; Christal, 1994; R.D. Roberts et al.), and the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB, a measure of intelligence). Results were equivocal. Although the MEIS showed convergent validity (correlating moderately with the ASVAB) and divergent validity (correlating minimally with the TSDI), different scoring protocols (i.e., expert and consensus) yielded contradictory findings. Analyses of factor structure and subscale reliability identified further measurement problems. Overall, it is questionable whether the MEIS operationalizes EI as a reliable and valid construct.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-231
Number of pages36
JournalEmotion
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Emotional Intelligence Meet Traditional Standards for an Intelligence? Some New Data and Conclusions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this