Diversifying Diversity in Religious Education: A Rejoinder to Cragg-Kim and Hosffman Ospino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article, I comment on responses to my Presidential Address offered by HyeRan Kim-Cragg and Hosffman Ospino. While I take on board their call to diversify the references on defending pedagogies of difference and hope, I caution against judging arguments on the grounds of the origins of their authors. Neither Enlightenment nor Counter-Enlightenment thought can provide a defensible basis for this dialogical pedagogy, I argue. So, we need a new start grounded in authors who eschew comprehensive universal views that marginalize particular groups such as the historic otherization of Jew and Judaism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-225
Number of pages5
JournalReligious Education
Volume115
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 May 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 The Religious Education Association.

Keywords

  • Pedagogy
  • difference
  • diversity
  • hope

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Religious studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diversifying Diversity in Religious Education: A Rejoinder to Cragg-Kim and Hosffman Ospino'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this