Distributive spending and presidential partisan politics

Yaniv Reingewertz, Thushyanthan Baskaran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Do Republican and Democratic presidents vary in their geographic allocations of federal spending? Recent scholarship suggests that US presidents provide more federal outlays to districts represented by their co-partisans, but leave the issue of partisan affiliation unanswered. We explore that question using an updated database that covers federal spending programs over the 1984–2014 period. We show that the alignment effect found in previous studies cannot be observed for Republican presidents. We argue that Republican presidents may not use pork as much as Democratic presidents because their core constituency is fiscally conservative. One implication of the results reported herein is that the electoral benefits of distributive politics depend on the fiscal preferences of the electorate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-85
Number of pages21
JournalPublic Choice
Issue number1-2
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.


  • Congress
  • Democrats
  • Distributive spending
  • Partisan alignment
  • President
  • Republicans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Distributive spending and presidential partisan politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this