Abstract
The present study was set up to test the perceived distribution of verbal and physical violent behaviors among same- and opposite-genders. More specifically, those perceived violent behaviors are examined as the outcome of adolescents' cost-risk goals. The study assumes two conflicting social goals: Whereas the goal of risk reduction may motivate withdrawal from conflict, and decrease the prevalence of violent events, the goal of pursuing social status may motivate initiation and/or retaliation, thus increasing the prevalence of violence. The study is based on a sample of 155 high-school students that recorded the frequency of observing violent events in their peer group over a one-week period. Findings demonstrate that for males, opponent gender had a primary effect on violence distribution. Males exhibited violence against males more frequently than against females. This result is consistent with the assumption that males set a higher priority to pursuing social status. For females, verbal violence was more frequent than physical forms of aggression. This is consistent with the assumption that females set a higher priority on avoiding risk. These results are discussed from an evolutionary cost-risk perspective.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 272-280 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | American Journal of Men's Health |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Distribution of violence
- Gender differences
- Goal driven aggression
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health