Abstract
During the extreme disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic, abrupt shifts to mandatory working from home altered employees’ work–family balance. Yet not all employees suffered from this abrupt shift in the same manner. Guided by Conservation of Resources theory as a theoretical framework and a three-wave longitudinal study with data collected from the pandemic’s onset, we test whether work–family balance trajectories vary depending on pre-pandemic supervisory support and prior experience with working from home. Results showed that for employees without prior remote work experience, strong supervisory support prevented a decline in work-family balance over time. In contrast, for those with previous remote work experience, supervisory support did not mitigate the negative trajectory, in fact, this group experienced the greatest disruption to their work-family balance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 271-293 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | International Journal of Human Resource Management |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- COR theory
- Work-family balance
- enforced remote work
- pre-change resources
- transitioning to remote work
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Strategy and Management
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disrupted balance: understanding work–family balance dynamics during enforced remote work transitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver