Differences in the physical properties of native and partially degraded phytochrome as probed by their differential sensitivity to permanganate oxidation

Orna Baron, Bernard Lewis Epel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The differential sensitivities to permanganate oxidation of the red and far-red forms of native phytochrome from Avena sativa L. cv Mulaga (isolated as Pfr from red-irradiated tissue) and of partially degraded phytochrome (isolated as Pr from nonirradiated tissue) were determined. The far-red absorbing form of partially degraded phytochrome was 5 times more sensitive than its red-absorbing form, while both the far-red and red forms of native phytochrome exhibited identical sensitivity. The present data obtained with partially degraded phytochrome are in apparent agreement with the data and model of Hahn, Kang, and Song (1980 Biochem Biophys Res Commun 97: 1317-1323). Their model suggests that the chromophore of the red-absorbing form of phytochrome is buried in a hydrophobic crevice in the protein, while that of the far-red form is exposed. The data obtained with native phytochrome, however, are at variance with their model. Our data obtained with native phytochrome suggests that the chromophore of the red and the far-red absorbing forms of native phytochrome both are in a relatively protected environment and that only following partial proteolytic degradation of the phytochrome does the chromophore of its far-red form become relatively more exposed. The protective influence of the labile peptide could either be direct, because of its close physical proximity to the chromophore, or indirect, resulting in an alteration in chromophore-protein interaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-474
Number of pages4
JournalPlant Physiology
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in the physical properties of native and partially degraded phytochrome as probed by their differential sensitivity to permanganate oxidation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this