Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Developmental trends in utilizing perceptual closure for grouping of shape: Effects of spatial proximity and collinearity

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In two experiments, visual search was used to study the grouping of shape on the basis of perceptual closure among participants 5-23 years of age. We first showed that young children, like adults, demonstrate an efficient search for a concave target among convex distractors for closed connected stimuli but an inefficient search for open stimuli. Reliable developmental differences, however, were observed in search for fragmented stimuli as a function of spatial proximity and collinearity between the closure-inducing fragments. When only closure was available, search for all the age groups was equally efficient for spatially close fragments and equally inefficient for spatially distant fragments. When closure and collinearity were available, search for spatially close fragments was equally efficient for all the age groups, but search for spatially distant fragments was inefficient for younger children and improved significantly between ages 5 and 10. These findings suggest that young children can utilize closure as efficiently as can adults for the grouping of shape for closed or nearly closed stimuli. When the closure-inducing fragments are spatially distant, only older children and adults, but not 5-year-olds, can utilize collinearity to enhance closure for the perceptual grouping of shape.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1264-1273
    Number of pages10
    JournalPerception and Psychophysics
    Volume68
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2006

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Sensory Systems
    • General Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental trends in utilizing perceptual closure for grouping of shape: Effects of spatial proximity and collinearity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this