Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by ChatGPT, have significantly reshaped text generation, particularly in the realm of writing assistance. While ethical considerations underscore the importance of transparently acknowledging LLM use, especially in scientific communication, genuine acknowledgment remains infrequent. A potential avenue to encourage accurate acknowledging of LLM-assisted writing involves employing automated detectors. Our evaluation of four cutting-edge LLM-generated text detectors reveals their suboptimal performance compared to a simple ad-hoc detector designed to identify abrupt writing style changes around the time of LLM proliferation. We contend that the development of specialized detectors exclusively dedicated to LLM-assisted writing detection is necessary. Such detectors could play a crucial role in fostering more authentic recognition of LLM involvement in scientific communication, addressing the current challenges in acknowledgment practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4-13 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Data and Information Science |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Teddy Lazebnik et al., published by Sciendo.
Keywords
- LLM-assisted writing
- Scientific communication
- Writing style
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Administration
- Library and Information Sciences
- Information Systems and Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting LLM-assisted writing in scientific communication: Are we there yet?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver