Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions - The case of Gaza settlers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In this article, the authors examine the consequences of the hostile-media phenomenon and advance the argument that people's perceptions of hostile coverage shape their trust in mainstream media institutions. Media trust in turn affects trust in democracy and willingness to accept democratic decisions. These ideas are tested on a sample of Jewish Settlers in the Gaza Strip, in the weeks before a Likud Party vote on Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to pull out of the Gaza Strip and evacuate settlers from their homes. Findings show that hostile media perceptions were negatively related to settlers' trust in media and that trust in media was positively related to trust in democracy, which, in turn, affected settlers' intentions to forcefully resist Sharon's evacuation plan. No direct association was found between hostile media perceptions and intentions to forcefully resist evacuation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-51
Number of pages24
JournalHarvard International Journal of Press/Politics
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 2005


  • Gaza settler
  • Hostile media perceptions
  • Trust in democracy
  • Trust in media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions - The case of Gaza settlers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this