@inbook{d58fed1587f1402096fcf745b4f16557,
title = "Defining Religion",
abstract = "When philosophers and sociologists have sought to define {\textquoteleft}religion{\textquoteright}, their definitions have invariably stumbled in the face of counter-examples. Some definitions have been too exclusive—failing to include non-theistic religions. Some have been too inclusive—failing to exclude non-religious ideologies (such as Marxism). This chapter takes religiosity to be conceptually prior to religion. Accordingly, a definition of religiosity is first proposed, which in turn allows for a definition of religion that seems immune to any obvious counter-example. Religiosity, it is argued, demands community, faith, and imagination. Religions are systems of ideas and/or practices that call for religiosity in a way that non-religions do not.",
author = "Samuel Lebens",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
language = "English",
isbn = "9780192862976",
volume = "10",
series = "Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "146--165",
editor = "Lara Buchak and Zimmerman, {Dean W.}",
booktitle = "Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion",
address = "United States",
}