Abstract
This paper presents an integrative framework for analyzing decisions. Three generic modes of decision making are identified: consequential choice (comparing alternatives in terms of expected consequences), matching (evaluating single options in terms of a certain criterion) and reassessment (re‐evaluating an action to which one is already committed). The three generic modes are compared on a common set of attributes, and the conditions for their proper use are outlined. Two case analyses illustrate how the framework can be used to analyze specific decisions from multiple perspectives.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-65 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1994 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Philosophy
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Decision Making in Three Modes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver