Abstract
The characteristics of decision-makers are generally not included in models of environmental-economic conflicts. These models can be classified in two classes according to their goal: Multi Objective models include several conflicting objective functions that should be optimized simultaneously, and Game Theory models that result in a single solution analyzing the interactions among the players. Despite their applicability and usefulness these models have several limitations. The most severe is that, generally, the decision-maker is absent from both classes of models. We suggest an operational model for environmental-economic conflict resolution from the point of view of the decision-makers which addresses these concerns. The first step is building the Pareto frontier. Then the focus moves to the decision-maker characteristics: The appropriate game theoretic tool used to solve the conflict is chosen according to those characteristics. The result of this tailor-made game is a single Pareto optimal response which reflects both the decision-maker characteristics, the real-word relations of power between her and the players and among the players themselves. Introducing explicitly the decision-maker preferences in the model, results in more efficient solutions, and allow for a clear explanation about why the chosen solution is better than any other one, subject to the initial decision-maker characterization.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 77-87 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Environmental Science and Policy |
Volume | 98 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- Decision-makers
- Environmental-economic conflicts
- Game theory
- Multi-objective models
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law