Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess Israeli certification program for teachers of gifted taking its initial steps in 5 locations. Research sample comprised 40 stakeholders. Goodlad’s model of curriculum transformation constituted a framework for describing the various programs as they change from the Ministry to the teachers studying them. Data concerning the different facets suggested by Goodlad were collected via semi-structured and deep interviews, analysis of documents, and classroom observations. Significant differences were found between the two types of certification programs in four of the five facets of curriculum: (a) formal-referring to Ministry rationale and program design and structure; (b) perceived–referring to local program design, and program coordinator’s role; (c) operational–referring to enactment of perceived curriculum by lecturer, and contents taught; and (d) experienced–referring to learners’ perception regarding program contribution and disadvantages. Study findings suggest that both types of certification programs, although taking a different approach, experienced difficulties along curriculum transformation. The study proposes factors for examining curriculum transformation in certification programs, and discusses practical implications for future consideration.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 29-51 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Gifted and Talented International |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Dec 2010 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2010, © 2010 — World Council for Gifted and Talented Children. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Professional development
- certification program
- curriculum transformation
- program coordinator’s role
- program design
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology