Cost–benefit analysis of full and partial river restoration: the Kishon River in Israel

Nir Becker, Asael Greenfeld, Shiri Zemah Shamir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Restoration of rivers is important because they provide many ecosystem services. However, full restoration is costly, and with limited resources, the priority of the different elements of a restoration plan needs to be considered. In this article the benefits of separable restoration components were analyzed for the Kishon River in Israel. The proposed restoration plan contained four segments: riverbed cleaning, ecological restoration, accessibility, and sports facilities. We used non-market valuation to estimate benefits and found the full restoration programme to pass the cost–benefit test, but partial restoration to be more efficient. Based on these conclusions, different funding alternatives are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-890
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Water Resources Development
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Israel
  • Urban river restoration
  • contingent valuation
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • travel cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost–benefit analysis of full and partial river restoration: the Kishon River in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this