The authors regret < We have recently discovered a minor typo coding problem, in the explanation of the coding process (section 2.6 behavioralanalysis). for some reason, the coding got mixed up, and where there is a 0 it is supposed to be a 1 and vice versa. It should be written that preference for a closer space was scored as 0 (and not 1 as written) and preference for a larger distance should be written 1 (and not 0 as written). so the paragraph should be written as follow: we checked the data, and there is not confusion there, its just in the typying of the coding. Responses were coded 0 or 1 in the following manner. Preferences for a room with a closer space between the objects were scored 0, while preferences for larger distances were scored 1. Scores were averaged across blocks that were the same (social blocks compared to non-social blocks), yielding one score for the social blocks and one score for the non-social blocks for each treatment session. we will be glad to correct this error so the graph would make more sense. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Biological Psychiatry