Abstract
In the published article, there was an error. In the Abstract, we reported results that were exploratory along with results that were consistent with hypotheses, without distinguishing between the two. A correction has been made to the Abstract. This sentence previously stated: “Consistent with hypotheses, unvaccinated (vs. vaccinated) individuals reported higher perceived ambiguity, reactance, and anger as well as perceived lower susceptibility, severity, worry, positive emotion, and intentions to vaccinate.” The corrected sentence appears below: “Consistent with hypotheses, unvaccinated (vs. vaccinated) individuals reported higher perceived ambiguity, reactance, and anger as well as perceived lower susceptibility, severity, worry, and intentions to vaccinate. Unvaccinated (vs. vaccinated) individuals also reported lower positive emotion.” The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1619192 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Public Health |
| Volume | 13 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2025 Simonovic, Gesser-Edelsburg and Taber.
Keywords
- ambiguity
- emotions
- health behavior
- intentions
- risk perception
- vaccine hesitancy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum: Examining psychological correlates of vaccine hesitancy: a comparative study between the US and Israel (Frontiers in Public Health, (2025), 12, (1480419), 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1480419)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver