Correction to: A necessary condition for the guarantee of the superiorization method (Optimization Letters, (2025), 10.1007/s11590-025-02192-7)

In this article, in the sentence beginning' Numerous works…’, the text “[, Theorem 4.1] about 18strict” should have read “[18, Theorem 4.1] about strict”. In the sentence beginning ‘Definition 3.1 [, Definition 1]…’ the text “[, Definition 1] 11Bounded” should have read “[11, Definition 1] Bounded”. In the sentence beginning ‘The strong convergences…’ the text “(see [, Proposition 5.4]).34” should have read “(see [34, Proposition 5.4])”. In the sentence beginning ‘The strong convergences…’ the text “([, Theorem 12]) Assume that 17{“ should have read “([17, Theorem 12]) Assume that {“. In the sentence beginning ‘The strong convergences…’ the text “the space 34X is” should have read “the space X is”. In the sentence beginning ‘The strong convergences…’ the text “see [, Definition 5.1].” should have read “see [34, Definition 5.1]”. In the sentence beginning ‘Theorem 3.6…’ the text “[, Theorem 4.1] Assume that 18{“ should have read “[18, Theorem 4.1] Assume that {“. In the sentence beginning ‘We consider the Dynamic…’ the text “about [, Algorithm 4.1],” should have read “about [18, Algorithm 4.1],” In the sentence beginning ‘We consider the Dynamic…’ the text “Theorem 183.6, exactly” should have read “Theorem 3.6, exactly”. In the sentence beginning ‘Example 4.5 Let X ∶= ℝ, let _ ∶ X → X be…’ the text “subset of ℝ.” should have read “subset of R.” In this article the ‘Conflict of Interest’ statement was incorrectly given as ‘The authors declare that they have conflict of interest this work’ but should have been ‘The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to the content of this work‘. The original article has been corrected.