Abstract
In a recent article, “Logical Consequence and Natural Language,” Michael Glanzberg claims that there is no relation of logical consequence in natural language (2015). The present paper counters that claim. I shall discuss Glanzberg’s arguments and show why they don’t hold. I further show how Glanzberg’s claims may be used to rather support the existence of logical consequence in natural language.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179-200 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Dialectica |
| Volume | 999 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 18 Nov 2022 |