Comparison between fixed thresholds and genetic algorithm methods for water quality event detection

Jonathan Arad, Mashor Housh, Lina Perelman, Avi Ostfeld

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This study compares two methods of identifying contamination events in water distribution systems. The GA dynamic threshold versus the fixed threshold method which both result in tools designed to provide the decision maker with a comprehensive yet understandable view point of all data available. Results of the comparison show that the GA approach performs better than the fixed threshold method in the identification of contamination events and that the fixed threshold mechanism results in lower false alarms. The sensitivity of the GA is the result of the dynamics of the threshold, while the lower number of false alarms in the fixed thresholds model are due to the constant values of the thresholds. Some pre-determined customized parameters must be set in order for the GA to reflect the utilities view of the water distribution system characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference 2012, WDSA 2012
Pages1232-1244
Number of pages13
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference 2012, WDSA 2012 - Adelaide, SA, Australia
Duration: 24 Sep 201227 Sep 2012

Publication series

Name14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference 2012, WDSA 2012
Volume2

Conference

Conference14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference 2012, WDSA 2012
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityAdelaide, SA
Period24/09/1227/09/12

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between fixed thresholds and genetic algorithm methods for water quality event detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this