Comparing the handwriting behaviours of true and false writing with computerized handwriting measures

The goal of this study is to compare the handwriting behaviours of true and false writing. Based on the cognitive load and disautomaticity known to be experienced while communicating a deceptive message, we hypothesized a difference (in temporal and spatial, pressure measures and peak velocities) between the handwriting of true vs. false messages. Thirtyfour participants wrote true and false sentences on a digitizer, which is part of a new system called the Computerized Penmanship Evaluation Tool (ComPET). The ComPET evaluates brainhand performance, as manifested through handwriting behaviour, and was found to be a valid measure for detecting the disautomaticity that is indicative of certain diseases in the clinical field. Differences were found in mean pressure, spatial measures (mean stroke length and mean stroke height), but no differences were found in temporal measures and in the number of peak velocities. The use of ComPET in lie detection is discussed.