Abstract
This study uses the recent Red Sea crisis to assess the collateral trade costs of militarized conflict. Using monthly trade data, we show that attacks by Iran-backed Houthis triggered a sharp decline in flows typically routed through the Suez Canal, with larger losses among country pairs reliant on this route. However, this divergence was short-lived, as trade among these dyads rebounded within months. Despite one of the most significant disruptions to maritime transport in decades, countries maintained trade with their first-best partners. We attribute this resilience to the shipping industry’s adaptability. These findings speak to debates on wartime substitution and ‘trade through globalization’: features of the shipping sector–one of the most globalized industries–enhance countries’ ability to mitigate trade disruptions. As a result, the deterrent effect of trade disruptions, emphasized in liberal theories, may be weaker in a still-globalized system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Defence and Peace Economics |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- The Red Sea crisis
- globalization
- maritime routes
- trade
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Come sail your ships around me: wartime trade, distance, and the impact of the global shipping industry on the pacifying effect of trade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver