Cognitive-behavioral and humanistic group treatment for children with learning disabilities: A comparison of outcomes and process

The authors of this study examined the outcomes and processes of 2 types of group treatment-cognitive-behavioral treatment groups (CBTG) and humanistic group therapy (HGT)-offered to 200 elementary schoolchildren in a center for students with learning disabilities in Israel. Results indicated that the addition of either type of group treatment to individual academic assistance was more effective than the latter alone on most measures. In fact, on the majority of measures, group treatment without academic assistance was more effective than just individual assistance. Finally, HGT was more effective than CBTG on most measures. Most of the outcomes were sustained at follow-up, and some even increased from termination to follow-up, although effect sizes were quite low. Process measures included the Client Behavior System and the therapist Helping Skills System, which were measured at 5 points in time. Differences between the 2 treatment types were revealed on both process measures, including differences in the growth curve of these behaviors.