Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective

Arie W. Kruglanski, Ofra Mayseless

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    This article assumes that social comparisons (a) constitute comparative judgment governed by the general process that applies to all judgments, (b) possess a common comparative structure including simple judgments of comparison stimuli and their juxtaposition, and (c) possess unique contents that determine the subjects meanings of comparison outcomes and their psychological implications. Examined in these terms classical social comparison theory is found wanting in two respects: (a) It conveys a relatively fixed notion to similar others and predominatly for the sake of evaluative accuracy. (b) Its narrow scope excludes numerous singificant issues of interest to social comparison research today. It is proposed that the present, multilevel approach is useful for ordering past social comparison research and provides a heuristically rich paradigm for future work.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-208
    Number of pages14
    JournalPsychological Bulletin
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - 1990

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology (all)


    Dive into the research topics of 'Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this