Abstract
Public administration literature usually assumes that citizens' participation in administrative decision-making (PDM) processes can improve public sector performance and trust. In this article, we question the universality of this assumption, arguing that PDM processes will have positive results in terms of performance and trust only when there are available channels to influence policy outcomes and democratic participatory behavior. We construct theoretical arguments based on a mechanism of social learning and illustrate them by reference to the case of Israel. The framework highlights the centrality and importance of culture and social characters for the study and planning of public administration reforms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 438-460 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | International Journal of Public Administration |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Alternative politics
- Citizen participation in decision-making
- Political culture
- Social learning
- Trust
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Public Administration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Citizens' learning, involvement, and participation in decision-making under the democratic ethos: A theoretical framework and the Israeli experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver