Abstract
When graduate students in professional psychology violate an honor system and cheat on a test, the faculty response must balance both ethical and humanitarian considerations. By following an actual incident from detection to disposition, a number of dilemmas are considered. Relevant principles from the American Psychological Association's ethical code for psychologists, the student-professor interactions, and a short-term follow-up further elucidate the complexity of the factors involved. The author's handling of the incidents stems from (a) a model of training (Ekstein & Wallerstein, 1972) emphasizing the importance of the supervisor-supervisee dyad for the learning of the student and (b) a model of interaction emphasizing responsibility and repair in the conduct of human relationships.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10-14 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Professional Psychology: Research and Practice |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1986 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cheating, Ethics, and Graduate Training in Professional Psychology. Crime and Punishment or Misjudgment and Repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver