Changing Israeli perceptions of the relations with the International Committee of the Red Cross in the wake of the June 1967 war: From coexistence to open hostility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since 1948/1949 The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been synonymous in the ArabIsraeli context with processes of exchanging prisoners and caring for human lives. After the 1967 war the ICRC changed in status from that of a mediator to that of the executive arm of larger forces. The processes leading to the partial demise of the ICRC are clearly identified in retrospect. It has to do with the asymmetry of perceptions between Israel and the organisation. Israel did not agree to the application of the Fourth Convention in the territories. The ICRC believed that this population fell under the Convention and therefore under the ICRC. Furthermore, the ICRC failed in getting the Israeli POWs back home, especially after the conclusion of the War of Attrition in 1970. The resulting feelings eliminated in the Israeli decision makers’ minds the role that the ICRC saw for itself in future POW exchange deals. After the 1973 war the ICRC would lose its position as a negotiator, leaving that arena to other international actors. 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)756-768
Number of pages13
JournalMiddle Eastern Studies
Volume55
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Foreign policy
  • International organisations
  • Israel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changing Israeli perceptions of the relations with the International Committee of the Red Cross in the wake of the June 1967 war: From coexistence to open hostility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this