Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience

Helen J. Neville, Daphne Bavelier, David Corina, Josef Rauschecker, Avi Karni, Anil Lalwani, Allen Braun, Vince Clark, Peter Jezzard, Robert Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cerebral organization during sentence processing in English and in American Sign Language (ASL) was characterized by employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 4 T. Effects of deafness, age of language acquisition, and bilingualism were assessed by comparing results from (i) normally hearing, monolingual, native speakers of English, (ii) congenitally, genetically deaf, native signers of ASL who learned English late and through the visual modality, and (iii) normally hearing bilinguals who were native signers of ASL and speakers of English. All groups, hearing and deaf, processing their native language, English or ASL, displayed strong and repeated activation within classical language areas of the left hemisphere. Deaf subjects reading English did not display activation in these regions. These results suggest that the early acquisition of a natural language is important in the expression of the strong bias for these areas to mediate language, independently of the form of the language. In addition, native signers, hearing and deaf, displayed extensive activation of homologous areas within the right hemisphere, indicating that the specific processing requirements of the language also in part determine the organization of the language systems of the brain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)922-929
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume95
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this